🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate nuclear talks with Washington provided that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy worked, and shared recent overtures had originated from go-betweens to resume discussions with the US government. He said Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is walking a complex course since Iran wishes not to be seen to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Following this, European countries exercised their privilege to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if talks reopen.

The American leader in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the conference, designed to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of global regulations, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be settled by military means. He asserted the strikes commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust hard to reestablish.

Negotiations Continues the Final Solution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always attempted to enforce their will during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary answer to resolve disagreements, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and respect, they will get a answer in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and machinery, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this invasion."